Starr v. Al Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 1280 · 1994
Citation profile
71 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 126 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Ellis v. United States (2002), Brewer v. Reynolds (1995)
71 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Arizona v. Fulminante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“that 'a right to which a defendant is not entitled absent some threshold showing [cannot] fairly be defined as basic to the structure of a constitutional trial.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a]s Ake explains, due process requires access to an expert who will conduct, not just any, but an appropriate examination,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.