Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. v. Swift Adhesives, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 1547 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2017
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Wisconsin v. Illinois · United States v. Drabeck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'; quoting Standard Alliance Indus. v. Black Clawson Co., 587 F.2d 813 , 820 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 923 , 99 S.Ct. 2032 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979)) (emphasis added). . Specifically, Plaintiff asserts that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“explicitly extend to future performance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t should be clear that this extension of the normal warranty period does not occur in the usual case, even though all warranties in a sense apply to the future performance of goods.”). The rationale underlying the rule is fulfillment of statutory purpose. Section 2-725”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.