Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.3d 185 - Sprague v. King

Sprague v. King’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.3d 185 · 1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
December 2002
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 1222 · 5 U.S.C. § 2301 (Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002) · 5 U.S.C. § 5372 · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Butz v. Economou · Heckler v. Chaney · United States v. Fausto · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Lincoln v. Vigil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]hat [the APA] directs claims ... to the federal circuit rather than to the district courts and regional courts of appeals, is more in the nature of a venue rule ... than of a limitation on jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.