Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.3d 281 - Pendleton v. Conoco Inc.

Pendleton v. Conoco Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.3d 281 · 1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. Parks · Lincoln v. Wackenhut Corp. · McDonald v. Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. · Sanchez v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “standard for ... judgment as a matter of law ... is identical to the standard for summary judgment....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.