Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 F.3d 402

Docket No. 93-7288.

Monroe v. McAllister

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided: May 10, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-05-10

Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004 · most notably Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004), Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno (1995)

36 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-05-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-2191-WN)

Albert Monroe, appellant pro se.

John G. Packard, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Monroe v. McAllister, No. CA-93-2191-WN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1993). We deny Monroe's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/23/f3d/402 · .json · Public domain