Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 F.3d 404

Docket No. 92-6982.

United States v. Postell

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 30, 1993. Decided May 6, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-05-06

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Rukaj

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-05-06

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-88-136-C-CR, CA-92-58-3-P)

Donald Lamont Postell, Appellant Pro Se.

Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC. for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Donald Lamont Postell appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Postell, No. CR-88-136-C-CR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisioal process.

AFFIRMED

/23/f3d/404 · .json · Public domain