Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 F.3d 404

Docket No. 94-6219.

United States v. Thomas

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided: May 20, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-05-20

Relies on United States v. Rukaj

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-05-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-91-212)

Wayne Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Scott Zimmerman, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his request for a transcript of the grand jury hearing, at the government's expense. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. CR-91-212 (D. Md. Feb. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/23/f3d/404 · .json · Public domain