United States v. Budd’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 442 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · United States v. Powell · Mathews v. United States · Jacobson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a reasonable jury could have found that the Government proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires a showing that a defendant was induced by the government to commit a crime for which he lacked any predisposition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.