Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange Commission’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 452 · 1994
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 27 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 145 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably American Bioscience, Inc. v. Thompson (2001), County of Los Angeles v. Shalala (1999)
63 federal appellate · 27 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77S (§ 19 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78L (§ 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78W (§ 23 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Udall v. Tallman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 145 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]gency opinions, like judicial opinions, speak for themselves”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an agency's failure to state its reasoning or to adopt an intelligible decisional standard is [ ] glaring [ ] we can declare with confidence that the agency action was arbitrary and capricious”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although there is no express statutory provision authorizing the Commission to discipline professionals appearing before it, Rule 2(e), promulgated pursuant to its statutory rulemaking authority, represents an attempt by the Commission to protect the integrity of its own processes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.