Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.3d 586 - United States v. Loder

United States v. Loder’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.3d 586 · 1994

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Houlihan (1996), United States v. Spinney (1995)

67 federal appellate · 7 district ·

4101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Commissioner v. Engle · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Nobile v. Schindler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “associated [her]self with [Marielis's extortion] venture, participated in it as something [s]he wished to bring about, and sought by h[er] actions to make it succeed,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he government need not present evidence that precludes every reasonable hypothesis inconsistent with guilt in order to sustain a conviction.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[o]ur review of the district court's decision to deny a motion for acquittal is quite limited; we must affirm unless the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, could not have persuaded any trier of fact of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.