United States v. Monaco’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 793 · 1994
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably United States v. Crawford (2005), In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2009)
42 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Stinson v. United States · Fields v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. · United States v. Rivera · United States v. Headley · United States v. Kopp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in any case involving repeated acts over a period of time unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“spur of the moment conduct, intended to take advantage of a sudden opportunity.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]nstead of ending the fraud, [the defendant] continued it”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.