South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Silver Anchor, S.A., (Panama)’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 842 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2019
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Kossick v. United Fruit Co. · American Dredging Co. v. Miller · Sisson v. Ruby · Adams v. Bain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficiently similar to an in rem proceeding to make its decree recognizable by and binding on the American courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.