Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.3d 957 - Hughes v. Shalala

Hughes v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.3d 957 · 1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Pitzer v. Sullivan · Carnes v. Sullivan · Leidler v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no requirement that the pain be severely limiting [or] that the limitation of motion be marked.... The listing requires only limitation of motion....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Luebertha INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
  2. “The listing [only] requires ... any amount of x-ray evidence of arthritis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Luebertha INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.