Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 FAPPX 496 - Sharp v. Ingham County

Sharp v. Ingham County’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 2003
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · Morgan v. Church's Fried Chicken · Allard v. Weitzman · Mickey Gregory, As Administrator of the Estate of Gerald Gregory,/cross v. Shelby County, Tennessee · Sinay v. Lamson & Sessions Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.