Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 FRD 5 - Halpert v. Appleby

Halpert v. Appleby’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1997

3 state decisions

6019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hicklin v. Edwards · Cleaves v. Funk · Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co. · Woods v. Zellers · Tillman v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would be highly inconvenient and, indeed, demeaning to the dignity of the court and its officers if a defendant, by a mere denial, could force the plaintiff to take the deposition of the marshal in support of his official return.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.