Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F. Supp. 2d 39 - United States v. Drew

23 F. Supp. 2d 39 - United States v. Drew’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mistretta v. United States · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Witte v. United States · Nichols v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “he had the requisite state of mind, and took sufficiently premeditated actions to constitute attempted first degree murder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to that other offense, if the resulting offense level is greater than that determined”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Assault With Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted Murder,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.