23 F. Supp. 2d 855 - United States v. Andreas’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Griffin v. California · Darden v. Wainwright · United States v. Hasting · United States v. Sepulveda · United States v. Sblendorio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ask [themselves] why didn't we hear those defenses from Mr. Wilson and Mr. Andreas on June 27, 1995? That was their opportunity if they had a defense. They were confronted. That was their opportunity to give all these defenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he government bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants would have been convicted absent the unconstitutional remarks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.