Hanauer v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on 4 Ill. 2d 273 - Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co. · Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co. · 351 Ill. App. 289 - Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co. · 16 Ill. App. 2d 202 - Prill v. Illinois State Motor Service, Inc. · 9 Ill. App. 2d 87 - Allied Mills, Inc. v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think it clear that there was only one cause of action and that rested in Hanauer (the employee). The employer, Allied Mills, Inc., for the use of its insurance carrier had an interest in that cause of action to the extent of the amount of compensation paid, but this interest did not create a separate and independent cause of action in the employer. Its interest was merely as subrogee pro tanto of Hanauer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Horwich v. Price
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.