R-A-, 23 I&N Dec. 694 (A.G. 2005) ID 3504 (PDF) The Attorney General remanded the record to the BIA for reconsideration of its decision in Matter of R-A-, 22 I&N Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001 BIA 1999), following final publication of the proposed rule published at 65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000).
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2020
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
(A.G. 2005) Interim Decision #3504
In re R-A-, Respondent
Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005
Decided by Attorney General January 19, 20011
Decided by Board June 11, 1999
U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco,
California
FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel
BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(January 19, 2005)
The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for
reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at
65 Fed. Reg. 76,588
(Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision
in light of the final rule.
1
The Attorney General’s January 19, 2001, and the Board’s June 11, 1999, decisions in this
case were published as Matter of R-A-,
