MARROQUIN’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255A (§ 245a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Juan Manuel Murillo-Espinoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General · Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Renteria-Gonzalez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“judge has withheld a formal adjudication of guilt but has nevertheless imposed penalties or restraints upon the defendant's liberty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zazueta v. Barr“reflect a judgment about the merits of the underlying adjudication of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Rumierz v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.