Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 I&NDEC 722 - BLAKE

BLAKE’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Francis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Drax v. Reno · Campos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Cabasug v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there is no comparable ground of inadmissibility for the specific category of aggravated felony charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “could also form the basis for excludability,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hether a ground of deportation or removal has a statutory counterpart in the provisions for exclusion or inadmissibility turns on whether Congress has employed similar language to describe substantially equivalent categories of offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.