23 I. & N. Dec. 976 - OCEALLEAGH’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · United States v. Menasche · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · United States v. Peoni · Quinn v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“offenses that resulted in convictions obviously based on fabricated charges or predicated upon repressive measures against racial, religious, or political minorities”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guan v. Barr“conviction occurred primarily because of political considerations, to wit: the fact that the defendant was a Jew”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guan v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.