Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Kan. 659

Adkins v. Doolen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1880

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1880-01-15

Original Proceedings in. Mandamus. Action brought February 3, 1880, by Adkins, an elector of Labette county, who sued as well for himself as for all others… Held: then the board could not order another; and it matters not that the board should have given a wrong reason for a correct de^ cisión. To entitle a party to the writ of mandamus, it must be made to appear that he has a legal right to have something done by the board to which he seeks to have the writ directed.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1880-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1947

4 state decisions

101880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Petr Oariam:

¶1The motion to quash the alternative writ, issued in this case, is sustained, upon the authority of Reedy v. Eagle, ante, p. 254; Bobbett v. The State, 10 Kas. 9; and Turner v. Comm’rs, 10 Kas. 16.

¶2’ Judgment for costs will therefore be duly entered against the plaintiff.

/23/kan/659 · .json · Public domain