Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Kan. App. 2d 305 - Thompson v. State

23 Kan. App. 2d 305 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2019

8 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Halper · United States v. Broce · Austin v. United States · United States v. Ursery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A plea of guilty and the ensuing conviction comprehend all of the factual and legal elements necessary to sustain a binding, final judgment of guilt and a lawful sentence. Accordingly, when the judgment of conviction upon a guilty plea has become final and the offender seeks to reopen the proceeding, the inquiry is ordinarily confined to whether the underlying plea was both counseled and voluntary . If the answer is in the affirmative then the conviction and the plea, as a general rule, foreclose the collateral attack. There are exceptions where on the face of the record the court had no power to enter the conviction or impose the sentence ." ( Emphases added.) 488 U.S. at 569 , 109 S.Ct. 757 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Absent a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel, [movant's] argument that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his double jeopardy rights fails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.