Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Kan. App. 2d 547 - State v. Schmitter

23 Kan. App. 2d 547 - State v. Schmitter’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably State v. Reason (1997), 36 Kan. App. 2d 446 - State v. Gonzales (2006)

26 state decisions

220199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · United States v. Place

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"While conducting a routine traffic stop, a law enforcement officer may request the driver’s license and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation. Once the driver has complied and produced his or her license and registration, if no information is obtained in the computer check, he or she must be allowed to leave without further delay. In order to justify a further detention for questioning on matters not related to the original stop, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that the individual has committed, is committing, or is about to commit some other crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An individual is ‘seized’ when an officer restrains his freedom, even if the detention is brief and falls short of arrest. The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit unreasonable seizures as well as searches. [Citations omitted.] The scope and duration of a seizure must be strictly tied to and justified by the circumstances which rendered its initiation proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.