Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 La. Ann. 421

F. R. Stevenson & Co. v. Riser

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1871

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1871-05-15

<p>A judgment that lias been rendered on a citation, addressed to and served upon a partner of the defendant, in a partnership not alleged or shown to bo commercial, is an absolutonullity for want of citation. An hypothecary action to recover real estate incumbered-by a judicial mortgage resulting from the recording of such judgment, will, therefore, tail, because the judgment being absolutely null lor want of citation, tlio accessory obligation arising therefrom falls with it.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1937

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1871-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

IIowe, J.

¶1This is an hypothecary action to subject land of defendant Mrs. Riser to the pajment of a judgment alleged to have been obtained by the plaintiffs against George W. Genkins in the Third District Court of New Orleans. At the time the judgment was recorded in such a way as to act as a mortgage Genkins was owner of the-land. The principal defense is that the judgment against Genkins was. an absolute nullity for want of citation, and that defendants may urge, this nullity as against the hypothecary claims of plaintiffs.

¶2We are of opinion that the citation addressed to and served on the-partner of Gonkins, in a partnership not alleged or shown to be commercial, could not authorize a judgment against Genkins; that tliejudgment was an absolute nullity; and the accessory obligation herein sought to be enforced also absolutely null. 21 An. 27.

¶3Tbe cases cited by plaintiffs, announcing the doctrine that seizing-creditors can not attack for fraud a judgment rendered long before-. their claims originated, do not seem to be in point in opposition to-this view.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

¶5Rehearing refused.

/23/laann/421 · .json · Public domain