Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 La. Ann. 445

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1871

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1871-05-15

<p>APPEAL from the Third District Court, parish of Orleans.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1871-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1932

3 state decisions

101871188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wyly, J.

¶1This is a suit against the defendant to recover the State taxes for 1869 on a lot of ground forming the corner of St. Charles and Julia streets, measuring 108 by 160 feet, in square No. 217, bounded by St. Charles, Julia, Carondelet and St. Joseph streets. ’ ,

¶2The answer is that the defendant is not the owner of the lot of ground described in the petition; that said lot belongs, and for forty years has belonged to the “Poydras Female Orphan Asylum,” and is by law exempt from taxation; that on or about the thirty-first day of March, *4461859, the said Poydras Female Orphan Asylum, by notarial act, leased the said lot of ground to the defendant for the term of fifty years, and that there was no stipulation that the defendant shall pay the taxes or other real charges on said lot, and by the express terms of article 2672 of the Civil Code, the lessor, and not the lessee, must bear all the real charges and taxes upon the thing leased. The court gave judgment lor the defendant, and the plaintiff lias appealed.

¶3We do not find a note of evidence in the record, or that any evidence whatever was introduced to support the demand of the plaintiff. We find, however, in the record the contract of lease from the Poydras Female Asylum” to the defendant. Whether it was received in evidence or not, we are not informed by the record.

¶4We see no reason to disturb the judgment appealed from-

¶5Judgment affirmed.

¶6Rehearing refused.

/23/laann/445 · .json · Public domain