Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 MINN 304 - Fogle v. Schaeffer

Fogle v. Schaeffer’s Empirical Analysis

1877

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 1961
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Noonan v. Bradley · Gott v. Adams Express Co. · Kingsley v. Gilman · Fetz v. C. S. Clark & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As upon this principle, the authority of a foreign administrator, as such, to commence an action in this state is wholly dependent upon the statute, it follows that he must commence his action upon the terms which the statute prescribes, and not otherwise. If he commences an action upon any other terms, he commences it without authority, and if proper objection is taken, his action must fail. He must, therefore, file the prescribed authenticated copy before the commencement of his action, and his failure to do so, if properly objected to, is fatal, and cannot be cured by a filing after the commencement of his action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.