Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Misc. 2d 951

Kam v. Blank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1960-03-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1961

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-03-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The court erred in determining as a matter of law that the general release delivered to John I. Phlegar, Jr., discharged the defendant, a cotort-feasor. The general release effected a settlement of the action in New Jersey. Under the circumstances, the law of New Jersey should have been applied in a determination of the effect of the general release upon the liability of a cotort-feasor. The burden of proof is upon the defendant to sustain his contention that a general release under the law of New Jersey releases a cotort-feasor.

¶2The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event and motion for a new trial granted.

¶3Concur — Di Giovanna, Benjamin and Daly, JJ.

¶4Judgment and order reversed, etc.

/23/misc2d/951 · .json · Public domain