Bramlett v. Flick’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1965
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erhardt Boaro · Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. · Bath v. Valdez · Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co. · Garfield M. & M. Co. v. Hammer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An entry by one man on the land of another is an ouster of the legal possession arising from the title, or not, according to the intention with which it is done. If made under claim and color of right, it is an ouster; otherwise it is a mere trespass. In legal language, the intention guides the entry and fixes its character.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zerres v. Vanina
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.