Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 N.C. App. 423

209 S.E.2d 336

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1974-11-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1976

4 state decisions

Relies on Orange County v. Heath · State Ex Rel. State Board of Public Affairs v. Principal Funding Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Judge Baley

¶1dissenting.

¶2Plaintiff has brought an action against the State. Any waiver of the State’s immunity from suit must be by “plain, unmistakable mandate” of the Legislature and cannot be by implication or construction. Orange County v. Heath, 282 N.C. 292, 296, 192 S.E. 2d 308, 310; State ex rel. State Bd. of Public Affairs v. Principal Funding Corp., 519 P. 2d 503 (Okla. 1974). There being no clear waiver of immunity in the statute authorizing his employment, it follows that plaintiff cannot maintain this action. The order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to dismiss should be reversed.

/23/ncapp/423 · .json · Public domain