Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 N.C. App. 52 - State v. Johnson

23 N.C. App. 52 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 13 Wash. App. 386 - State v. Bresolin (1975), State v. Beaty (1982)

42 state decisions

18019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bass · State v. Potter · State v. Hicks · State v. Ballard · State v. . Nash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e find that the same evidence would not support a conviction in each case. Evidence of a robbery of property from the first victim will not support a conviction of a robbery of different property from a different victim. Here defendants threatened the use of force on separate victims and took property from each of them. They were not employees. It was not the employer who was robbed. Rather each separate victim was deprived of property. The armed robbery of each person is a separate and distinct offense, for which defendants may be prosecuted and punished.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is within the discretion of the trial judge to permit, in the interest of justice, the examination of witnesses at any stage of trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.