Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 N.J. 400 - State v. Kociolek

State v. Kociolek’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

209
cited by 209 later decisions
13
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 8 district · 185 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 209 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably United States v. Kovel (1961), 41 Ill. 2d 177 - The People v. Speck (1968)

9 federal appellate · 8 district · 185 state decisions — followed in 13 states

6701957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Wilson v. United States · Raffel v. United States · City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court · State v. Kociolek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 209 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and a scientific expert retained to aid in the presentation of the defense, a confidential employment”).) In Kociolek the court reviewed the history and purpose of the attorney-client privilege at length, noting that the”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`receive, weigh and consider [Hernandez's testimony relating to defendant's oral admissions] with caution,' in view of the generally recognized risk of inaccuracy and ... misconstruction by the hearer.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “as a natural exception to the then novel right of testimonial compulsion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.