Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 NM 508 - State ex rel. Clancy v. Porter

State ex rel. Clancy v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1993

5 state decisions

20191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ogden City v. Armstrong · Mulligan v. Smith · Zeigler v. Hopkins · Damp v. Town of Dane · 3 E.H. Smith 288 - Miller v. . City of Amsterdam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Freeman on Judgments, § 523, the rule is thus stated: ‘Wherever the jurisdiction of the court not of record depends on a fact which the court is required to ascertain and settle by its decision, such decision, if the court has jurisdiction of the parties, is conclusive, and not subject to any collateral fact.’ “[But] if the local board or other tribunal is authorized and empowered to take certain action only upon the petition of a majority of the property owners, taxpayers, or residents within a certain defined area or district, and is not vested with authority to determine whether or not the petition is signed by the owners of the required amount of property, residents,. or taxpayers, then its action may at any time be shown to have been without jurisdiction and void, by establishing the fact that the petition on which it acted was not so signed. This is stated to be the true rule by Freeman on Judgments, § 523.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.