In re Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc. (1976), In Re Roberts (1985)
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Spevack v. Klein · Cohen v. Hurley · City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Cannon · In Re the Will of Putnam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the [New York] Court of Appeals has noted that `with rare and conditional exceptions, the lawyer may not place himself in a position where a conflicting interest may, even inadvertently, affect or give the appearance of affecting, the obligations of the professional relationship’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“substantial likelihood of profound conflict, or for other policy reasons, representation is not permitted under any circumstances,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.