Pryor v. Webber’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 140 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), Columbus Finance, Inc. v. Howard (1975)
3 federal appellate · 140 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eichel v. New York Central Railroad · Lobalzo v. Varoli · Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc. · Powers v. Temple · Cunningham v. Rederiet Vindeggen A/S
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“measure of damages is that which will compensate and make the plaintiff whole.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The collateral source rule has been defined as 'the judicial refusal to credit to the benefit of the wrongdoer money or services received in reparation of the injury caused which emanates from sources other than the wrongdoer.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'It is a general rule that the burden of proving facts which must be established in order to make evidence admissible is on the party who wishes to give such evidence.' 1 Jones on Evidence, 387, Section 210. 'The party offering testimony has the burden of establishing its admissibility; and where there is a preliminary question of fact to be decided before evidence is admitted, the burden of proving the preliminary fact rests upon the proponent of the subject evidence.' 31A Corpus Juris Secundum 168, Evidence, Section 103.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.