State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2006
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Columbus v. Adams · State ex rel. Bunch v. Industrial Commission · 11 Ohio St. 3d 243 - State ex rel. Boyd v. Frigidaire Division, General Motors Corp. · State ex rel. Phillips v. Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If it appears to a judge at the time of sentencing for a violation of [driving while under the influence of alcohol offense, among others,] that the person convicted is an alcoholic or is suffering from acute alcohol intoxication and that, in lieu of imprisonment, the person would benefit from services provided by an alcohol and drug addiction program * * *, the court may commit the person to close supervision in any facility in the area in which the court has jurisdiction that is, or is operated by, such program. * * * Such supervision may include outpatient services and part-time release, except that a person convicted of a violation of division (A) of section 4511.19 of the Revised Code shall be confined to the facility for at least three days * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[nlotwithstanding any section of the Revised Code that authorizes the suspension of the imposition or execution of a sentence or the placement of -an offender in any treatment program in lieu of imprisonment, no court shall suspend *** the thirty consecutive days of imprisonment *** or place an offender *** in any treatment program in lieu of imprisonment until after the offender has served the *** thirty days of consecutive imprisonment ***.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“trial courts are precluded from exercising [discretion under R.C. 2935.33 (B) to impose a three-day sentence at a qualified treatment facility in lieu of imprisonment] with regard to multiple offenders under R.C. 4511.99 (A)(2) and (3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.