Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 OHIOST3D 185 - State v. Nagle

State v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Maus v. State (1987), State v. Bode (2015)

48 state decisions

22019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Louisiana · McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution · People v. Rodgers · State v. Babcock · State v. McMullen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “freedom of movement was not so severely restrained”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[W]hen a defendant’s sentence has been suspended and he has been placed on conditional probation pursuant to R.C.2951.04 and later violates the terms of such probation, the trial court is not required to credit time spent in a rehabilitation facility against any sentence originally imposed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “was confined for any reason arising out of the 8. Appellant's appellate counsel has set forth a table of dates when appellant was jailed throughout the pendency of his case. Counsel has conceded the record does not clearly establish certain periods of time appellant was jailed or confined in CCC, and counsel has noted this uncertainty by placing question marks throughout the table. Counsel also indicated that in putting together the table, she used a copy of appellant's confinement record from the Butler County Jail. Counsel acknowledges that this document is not part of the record on appeal. As such, we cannot rely on certain dates set forth in counsel's table. Our review of the issue of jail-time credit is limited to the information contained in the record on appeal. See App.R. 9(A). - 14 - Butler CA2018-04-079 offense for which the prisoner was convicted and sentenced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.