Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 OHIOST3D 225 - State v. Rohdes

State v. Rohdes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Thomas (1988), State v. Thompson (1987)

1 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

16019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · Ohio v. Johnson · State v. Awan · Ohio v. Wilkins · State v. Duncan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An offense may be a lesser included offense of another only if (i) the offense is a crime of lesser degree than the other, (ii) the offense of the greater degree cannot be committed without the offense of the lesser degree also being committed and (iii) some element of the greater offense is not required to prove the commission of the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o person shall cause the death of another as a proximate result of the offender's committing or attempting to commit an offense of violence that is a felony of the first or second degree and that is not [voluntary or involuntary manslaughter].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by the evidence produced on the record of this case, a trier of fact could have reasonably found that murder could not have been committed without also committing the involuntary manslaughter by aggravated menacing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.