23 Or. App. 173 - State v. Mattingly’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
February 1987
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Thus, it cannot be said that the failure to instruct on criminally negligent homicide prejudiced defendant by subjecting him to the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'If the jury had been instructed only on one offense or if the jury had found the defendant here guilty of manslaughter, we would have a different situation, and very likely a different result.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“A person acts with criminal negligence with respect to a result of his conduct when he fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that his conduct will cause such a result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hicks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.