Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. State · Linne v. State · Ashenfelter v. State · Scott v. State · Cragg v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Hamilton rule no longer barred [the sentencing judge] from considering these out-of-court statements when [the judge] resolved Evans's challenges to the allegations of sexual misconduct contained in the pre-sentence report. [[Image here]] Of course, it was up to [the sentencing judge] to determine what Evans's statements meant, and what events Evans was referring to. When Evans testified about these out-of-court statements, he insisted that he had been referring to innocent touchings that occurred during bathing. This was an issue of fact to be resolved by [the sentencing judge].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Charliaga v. State“was obliged to resolve the disputed allegations or expressly declare that he did not need to resolve them (and then order them removed from the pre-sen-tence report).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ulak v. State“making arguably incriminatory statements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ulak v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.