Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 R.I. 360

50 A 655

Kehoe v. Patton

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 30, 1901

Supreme Court of Rhode Island · decided 1901-11-30

<p>(1) Implied Contracts. Novation.</p> <p>A promise upon consideration to the debtor oí another to pay the debtor’s creditor the amount of his claim enures to the benefit of the creditor.</p> <p>{2) Election of Remedies. Implied Contracts. Novation.</p> <p>The bringing- of a suit in equity to set aside a deed, part of the consideration of which' was .the promise of the grantee to pay the grantor’s debt to the plaintiff, is not in itself such an election of remedies as to waive the provision in his favor arising out'of the grantee’s promise where the suit hi equity has not proceeded to a final decree.</p> <p>(3) Implied Contracts. Consideration.</p> <p>Where a party promises another, in consideration of the transfer of certain real estate to him, to pay the grantor’s creditor the amount of his claim, the consideration of the deed is such promise, and the law will not inquire as to the relative value of the land to the debt.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Heard on petition of defendant for new trial, and… · Decided 1901-11-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1980

5 state decisions

30190119101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This case comes before the court upon the defendant's petition for a new trial after decision of one justice of this Division, jury trial having been waived.

¶2The specific grounds assigned for the petition are: That the defendant did not make a valid promise to Doyle to pay the plaintiff's claim; that the plaintiff did not release Doyle as his debtor and accept Patton in his stead; that the plaintiff elected to treat the deed from Doyle to Patton as void, and to rely upon Doyle for payment, thus waiving any claim upon the defendant; that Doyle released defendant from the payment of this claim before this suit was begun; that there were not funds in the hands of the defendant wherewith to pay this claim.

¶3These points were all urged at the trial of the cause and are considered in the decision of Mr. Justice Rogers, who sat in the case. His findings of fact are fully supported by the evidence, and his conclusions of law are sustained by the decisions of this court. His decision is adopted as the opinion of the court.

¶4The petition for a new trial is denied, and judgment will be entered upon the decision.

¶5DECISION.

/23/ri/360 · .json · Public domain