¶1I feel constrained, under the authority of Robertson and Finley, to concur, otherwise I would hold that M. A. Riker, being over the age of fourteen, having acknowledged personal service, and having appeared and petitioned for the appointment of a guardian ad litem, which appointment was made, was a party before court and bound by the judgment.
23 S.C. 187
Riker v. Vaughan
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 3, 1885
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1885-07-03
<p>Before Aldrich, J., Charleston, April, 1885.</p> <p>The opinion fully states the case.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1986
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1885-07-03
View the full empirical analysis of this case →