Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 SO2D 786 - Harries v. Harang

Harries v. Harang’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1987

6 state decisions

3019451950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lawrence v. Young · Pierce v. Lefort

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There can be neither increase nor diminution of price on account of disagreement in measure, when the object is designated by the adjoining tenements, and sold from boundary to boundary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.