Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 So. 3d 1255

Craft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 23, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-12-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Cole v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-12-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant Cedrick Craft’s appeal is dismissed as this Court lacks jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion to rectify the court record is not an appealable order. Additionally, to the extent that Appellant is appealing the January 29, 2008 order denying his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion through *1256a filing styled “Motion to Rectify Court Record,” the trial court’s denial of the motion to rectify — even if treated as a motion for rehearing — was not timely filed within 15 days of the trial court’s order denying the Rule 3.850 motion, and, therefore, did not delay rendition of the January 29, 2008 order. See Cole v. State, 905 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

¶2Dismissed.

/23/so3d/1255 · .json · Public domain