Oken v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · 658 So. 2d 646 - Parkway Bank v. FORT MYERS ARMATURE WORK · Kilgore v. Bird · 4 So. 3d 614 - EAR v. State · 659 So. 2d 1082 - The Florida Bar v. Burkich-Burrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Similar specialty” is not defined within the statutes. Case law also provides little useful guidance. What is clear from the statutory amendment, however, is that assertions regarding experience in a particular area, standing by themselves, are insufficient absent evidence of practice in a similar specialty. This interpretation of the statutory language is consistent with the intent of requiring a presuit affidavit and with the legislative history regarding the 2003 statutory amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he courts of this state have uniformly recognized the availability of certiorari review in cases where the presuit notice requirements of chapter 766 have not been met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Riggenbach v. Rhodes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.