Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 So. 3d 201

Morgan v. Decker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 2009

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-11-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2014

1 state decisions

Relies on 3 So. 3d 1078 - Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Appellant asserts that the trial court committed reversible error during the trial by admitting evidence of appellant’s settlement agreement with another defendant and by denying appellant’s motions for mistrial and new trial after defense counsel mischaracterized the settlement agreement during opening statement. We agree that reversal is required by the recent decision in Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc., 3 So.3d 1078 (Fla.2009), which was issued after the appeal was taken in this case. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for a new trial.

¶2 REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
/23/so3d/201 · .json · Public domain