Bolden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc. · 861 So. 2d 1003 - Harris v. State · Hill v. Dunaway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[J]ury instructions should be taken as a whole with all jury instructions being read together and not taking a single instruction out of context.”) (citation omitted). . See Newell v. State, 49 So.3d 66, 73 (¶ 20) (Miss.2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. James v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.