Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 SO3D 885 - State v. Foster

State v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 337 So. 2d 1131 - State v. Sanders · 970 So. 2d 948 - State v. Baker · State v. Ruiz · 3 So. 3d 595 - State v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Djouble enhancement for purposes of Baker (ie., enhancement of enhanced penalties) did not occur because the state used that conviction only once on the count charging third offense possession of marijuana (to enhance the status of the crime and punishment from a second to third offense) and only once on the separate conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, to enhance defendant’s status from a second to third offender for sentencing purposes under the habitual offender law in La.R.S. 15:529.1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.