Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 SW3D 1 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

754
cited by 754 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

753 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Burks v. United States · In Re King's Estate · Tibbs v. Florida · Garza v. Alviar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 754 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The complete and correct standard a reviewing court must follow to conduct a Clewis 1 factual sufficiency review of the elements of a criminal offense asks whether a neutral review of all the evidence, both for and against the finding, demonstrates that the proof of guilt is so obviously weak as to undermine confidence in the jury’s determination, or the proof of guilt, although adequate if taken alone, is greatly outweighed by contrary proof....”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “particularly those determinations concerning the weight and credibility of the evidence.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the light most favorable to the prosecution”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.